Audi A1 hot hatch revealed

This is the new Audi A1, due for reveal at the 2010 Geneva motor show. It ‘condenses all the values of the brand down to less than four metres,’ according to Audi. The old A2 did that too (and arguably with more originality thanks to its all-aluminium construction) but while that was a car ahead of its time, this one is bang on schedule.

Looking like the offspring of an A3 and a Citroen Pluriel (but without the folding roof) it’s aimed squarely at the Mini – and another Citroen, the newly arrived DS3, which you can read about here.

So it’s a three-door, four-seat hatch and it’s available with a choice of four engines. There’s a 1.6 TDI with either 90bhp or 105bhp, but we don’t reckon either of those will suit the car as well as the 1.2 or 1.4 TFSI petrols that develop 86bhp and 122bhp respectively. All four come with stop/start technology, even if you specify the optional DSG ‘box.

With the fastest only posting 0-62mph in 9.1sec, it’s safe to assume that hotter ones will arrive further down the line, but for the time being Audi is known to want to concentrate on volume and to that end is targeting the standard Mini Cooper rather than the Cooper S.

Audi says the A1 will be the sportiest car in the class – a bold claim given it’s up against the Mini and uses Polo underpinnings – but the lightest one does weigh only 1045kg (a Cooper is 1140kg) and the engineers have worked hard to move weight further back in the chassis. A 200bhp S1? Let’s hope so, but expect Audi to build up to that with other models first.

The entry-point to A1 ownership is 16,000 euros (approx £13,990) and you’ll be able to personalise extensively – the roof arch comes in a choice of four colours, for instance. We don’t think it has the Mini’s exuberance, but the potential is there. We’ll pass further judgement when we see the A1 first-hand at March’s Geneva motor show, with live show reports on evo.co.uk.

The end of Ford’s 2.5-litre turbo

Ford’s characterful five-cylinder engine is to die. The 2.5-litre turbocharged appears in a number of Ford products, from the Kuga SUV and S-Max people carrier to the Focus ST and RS. Now that Ford’s cleaner and cleverer Ecoboost engines are on the scene, though, the writing is on the wall for the warbling five-pot.

While it’s an engine we’ll miss – especially with its 2-litre four-cylinder replacement being much less endearing on first impressions – it’s easy to see Ford’s rationale behind the 2.5’s culling. The new Ecoboost engines are set to offer cuts of over 15 per cent in fuel consumption and carbon emissions while offering similar power and more low-down torque.

And while the 2.5 engine suits the character of STs and RSs perfectly, its appearance in wider-appealing volume sellers has been a somewhat fruitless experience. The number of S-Maxes and Kugas equipped with it barely broke 100 units each in 2009, representing one per cent of each model’s overall sales total.

You can still buy a Focus hot hatch equipped with five-cylinder firepower, with the RS likely to be the engine’s final application. And heading to the Geneva motor show next month will be a Focus RS special edition. The WRC will be limited to just 50 units, all for the Swiss market, with some OZ Superturismo alloys and exterior graphics the only key changes; power (300bhp), torque (324lb ft) and those frisky dynamics remain the same.

What’s your thoughts on the death of Ford’s five-cylinder? Good riddance or a real shame?

Insuring a provisional driver? Pay-per-month is the best policy

Provisional Marmalade is offering to insure teenage learner drivers for as little as £91 a month

A new insurance policy for learner drivers, which costs around £90 a month, may be the answer for parents who are finding that putting their 17-year-old son or daughter on their own policy can cost £3,000.

The pay-per-month policy, which goes on sale at Halfords this week, also has the advantage that it’s written in the young driver’s name, so it won’t jeopardise the no-claims bonus of the parent if the learner crashes the car.

Over the last decade, the cost of insuring teenage drivers has shot up to the extent many parents can no longer afford to insure their offspring to allow them to practise in the family car. Quotes of thousands of pounds to put a teenager on a parent’s insurance are not uncommon, and way out of the reach of most. Insurance costs for young drivers have soared so high that most are now limited to the lessons they can buy from driving schools.

However, a new insurance company with an unlikely name, Provisional Marmalade, looks to have come up with a way of covering learner drivers without breaking the bank. For the first time, it is offering them the chance to buy comprehensive insurance by the month. It has been trialling these policies since last August and this week launched it to a wider audience following a tie-up with the Halfords chain.

The insurance is bought by, and is in the name of, the provisional driver. Those taking out a policy have to give the registration number of the vehicle in which they will be practising. The car has to be in insurance group 16 or below, and be worth less than £20,000.

The supervising driver must be over 25 and have held a full UK driving licence for at least three years. They don’t need to be the person who owns the car, which has to be insured in the normal way by its owner. You can buy the policy for as little as one month, to a maximum of three months, and renew as many times as you like. Policies cost between £90.95 and £99.50 per month depending on postcode.

“The cover is aimed at those who want to practise in their parents’ car in the run up to taking their test, but have so far been put off by the cost,” says Provisional Marmalade’s founder Nick Moger. “The risk of having a crash while you are accompanied is not that great, which is why we have been able to bring down the cost to something that is affordable.”

He says the main advantage of the policy is that it allows parents to let their children use their car without risking any no-claims bonus. Any claims caused by the provisional driver are paid separately to the main insurer of the parent.

The product is available at the company’s own website or Halfords, and has already grabbed the attention of young drivers.

Geoff Williams, who is 18 and living with his parents in Brighton, says it could be the answer to a huge problem for new drivers.

“I failed my first test and need to practise between lessons, but at the moment I can’t. When my dad looked at putting me on his insurance for his Citroën Picasso he was quoted a minimum of £3,000, which was completely out of the question,” he says.

“If I was able to buy a policy by the month that would let me drive and gain some much-needed experience that would be great.”

Parents should note that when the driver passes their test all cover under the policy ceases immediately, and if your child is going to continue driving your car you need to add them as a named driver to the policy. If there is an accident, or the car has a fire or is stolen while your insured learner is driving, they will have to pay the first £250 towards any claim.

Don’t get ripped off when you buy that secondhand car

If you are buying a secondhand car for a new driver – or for any other driver – make sure you are not denied your consumer rights if it goes wrong.

That was the warning from the Office of Fair Trading this week when it revealed the results of an investigation into secondhand car dealers.

Although the OFT says the legislation governing the £24bn secondhand car trade sufficient, it has a number of concerns: mainly that more needs to be done to ensure dealers are aware of the law, and consumers can access their rights. It says most faults with secondhand cars come to light in the first three months, suggesting many of these cars are not good enough. It is the dealer’s responsibility to fix faults.

Despite this, nearly 30% of buyers who contacted their dealer about a problem told the OFT they had not had it rectified. These consumers typically spend £425 fixing faults that are the dealer’s obligation to correct. That totals £85m a year.

The OFT has also warned dealers they can no longer hide behind the “sold as seen” get-out. Individuals buying cars from dealers have the Sale of Goods Act on their side, yet one in 11 dealers still use illegal disclaimers to get out of fixing faults, the OFT says.

Even if a car is described as sold as seen, you can still use the act to enforce your rights.

Heather Clayton, senior director of the OFT’s consumer group, says: “Buying a secondhand car is an expensive purchase for many people. Many dealers provide high standards of service and comply fully with the law but there continues to be high numbers of complaints to Consumer Direct which are often due to dealers’ refusing to deal with legitimate complaints or provide appropriate redress.

“We are issuing OFT’s guidance to the industry and expect all secondhand car dealers to be aware of their legal obligations. Along with our Trading Standards partners, we will take action against those dealers who continue to ignore the law.”

The market study was prompted by consistently high numbers of consumer complaints. Last year saw a rise of 5% in complaints about secondhand car sales with nearly 72,000 consumers reporting problems to the advice service Consumer Direct, making it the most complained about sector.

How to cut excess costs

If you are a regular user of car clubs, and occasional hirer of cars abroad, consider a new “excess” insurance policy from iCarhireinsurance.com.

It is similar to a previous Guardian Money best-buy (Insurance4carhire.com) but this is cheaper and, on paper, offers better cover.

Most clubs (and car renters) will offer fully comprehensive insurance with your membership package; however, this will often come with an excess – usually £500-£1,000.

While you can pay more to reduce this to zero, buying from a third party is much cheaper – particularly for multiple renters.

iCarhireinsurance.com will sell you an annual car rental excess policy (Europe only) for £39.99.

For an extra £19.99, buyers can add cover for all car club rentals. Users of Streetcar have to pay £129 annually to bring their excess to nothing, and it doesn’t cover car rentals abroad.

Insurance4carhire.com charges £49 a year for European cover. Unlike the new entrant, it doesn’t cover car rentals close to home. Both companies will refund excesses paid for damage to tyres and windscreens.

Ernesto Suarez of iCarhireinsurance.com says: “Many people find car hire insurance confusing. They end up spending a fortune at car rental desks, or find themselves with a huge excess bill at the end of their holiday after a small chip to their windscreen. In fact, with many policies not covering the most vulnerable parts of the car, you could easily get hit with both.”

Rabble-rousing about petrol prices

Labour’s Lindsay Hoyle is ignorant of the facts when he fingers fuel barons for pump prices when his government is to blame

In the run up to an election campaign, how useful for us to see how politics actually works in the raw. That view being given to us by Lindsay Hoyle MP in his recent piece here at Cif.

In essence, take a legitimate concern – the price of petrol – ignore GCSE-level economics (let alone anything more complex), sprinkle with ignorance and finish with some rabble-rousing about the filthy capitalists. All the while glossing over the simple fact that the major determinant of petrol prices is the taxes imposed by the very government that he supports.

Put simply, Hoyle tells us that oil prices in US dollars are down from their past peaks but petrol prices at the pumps are not. Thus we must be being ripped off by the oil companies and the solution is, well, apparently that Hoyle should have more influence over what petrol companies do.

So let us have the basics of the oil market explained shall we? The first thing is that the price is determined in US dollars. This is as true of oil pumped up within these kingdoms as it is without. The reason for this is that oil is fungible and is one of the few truly global markets. When the pound falls against the dollar (as it has done by some 30% in recent years), then the price of oil expressed in pounds will rise by the same amount. If companies in the North Sea kept their sterling price fixed then they would be losing possible profits as the dollar rose against sterling. So too would the Treasury, for they take some 50% of such profits, plus a great big fat royalty. This explains a large part of why petrol prices in sterling are as high as they were despite a fall in the dollar price of oil. Sterling has fallen against the dollar.

The second important thing is that refining and distributing petrol is not a particularly profitable activity. Indeed, for many years in the UK it was loss-making. The profits are made in the drilling for, finding of and pumping up of crude. Turning it into petrol to put in our cars is a low-margin high-volume business. There simply aren’t large profits to be taxed here.

Thirdly, at current prices (I’ll round because they can change day to day) of the £1.15 or so that you pay at the pumps, 55p or 56p goes in fuel duty. Around 40p goes to the retailer, wholesaler, refiner and whoever it is that has paid for those huge rigs in the middle of the oceans, plus all the tankers and pipelines connecting them. Then there’s VAT on top of the whole lot meaning that, again in round terms, the government gets 70p of the price per litre.

Now it is righteous and just that people should pay the costs of what they do. Fuel duty pays for the roads themselves, plus there’s some element of the taxation that goes to pay for the noise and other pollution caused – perhaps we could count in the cost of the NHS patching up accident victims and so on. Perhaps 30p of that 55p should be assigned to user fees. We can check this because when there was a tax difference between biodiesel and fossil fuel, that’s what the duty difference roughly was.

There is also, of course, climate change to consider. As the Stern Review told us, the social cost of carbon emissions is $80 a tonne. This is 11p on a litre of petrol. Thus, there should be this amount of tax to pay for that. And the fuel duty escalator has raised, since 1993 (it was imposed by Ken Clarke “to meet our Rio commitments”), the price by some 23p, without the latest mooted rises. So, currently, we are overtaxing petrol by some 12p a litre to meet all of the correct costs that should be assigned to this activity.

So, petrol is expensive in the UK because we pay too much tax on it. The price is high in sterling terms because the pound has fallen against the dollar. There’s no great trove of profits being made in refining or wholesaling of petrol. But an MP facing election has decided to call for confiscating those tiny to nonexistent profits (please do note, he says it is the petrol companies, retailers, not the international oil companies) in the hope that no one will note that his own government is responsible twice over. Once in the excessive tax levied and secondly in the decision to reduce the value of the pound.

In short, it was the other kid that did it and he ran away. Not me Guv.

Yes, this is silly, that such displayed ignorance and rabble-rousing will have an effect. Democracy only works if we see through such to the truths underneath. But this will work, tens of thousands will vote for Hoyle in Chorley, sad to say. And until we all grow up, politicians will continue to treat us as children and flannel us as Hoyle has done.

Petrol prices heading for record high of £5.40 a gallon, AA warns motorists

The AA and RAC are urging the chancellor to postpone a planned 3p hike in petrol duty, due on 1 April

Motorists should brace for record high petrol prices this year as the cost of unleaded fuel surges to £1.20 a litre or more, according to research by the AA.

In a stark warning to consumers, the organisation says those struggling on tight budgets would be hard hit by the predicted price hike and has urged the chancellor, Alistair Darling, to postpone the introduction of a planned 3p hike in petrol duty, due on 1 April.

The average petrol price is currently just over £1.15 a litre, but the AA says pump prices could nudge £1.20 by next month – equivalent to over £5.40 a gallon – when the petrol levy is due to start.

Figures show the average petrol bill for a two-car family has already soared by £52 a month in the past year, to £245.

The AA’s president, Edmund King, said: “The UK is barely out of recession, yet petrol threatens to rise to record prices seen during the boom of 2008, shortly before the collapse into recession.

“If families, drivers on fixed incomes and those on low pay were unable to cope with prices then, they are even less likely now.” King attributed the increase to rises in the price of wholesale petrol since January.

Surging petrol prices will also hit supermarkets which have recently absorbed some of the cost of pump increases.

The RAC has joined calls for the government to hold back new fuel duty charges, saying petrol prices were well below the £1 a litre mark when the levy was announced in last year’s budget.

Lindsay Hoyle, Labour MP on the Commons business select committee, called the increase a “complete disgrace”.

Speaking to the Daily Telegraph, he said: “Yes, crude oil has gone up this year, but nothing like the rise in petrol prices. Motorists are being legally mugged at the forecourt by petrol companies.”